United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 1099 v. Southwest Ohio Essay

United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 1099 v. Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority, 163 F.3d 341 Rita Miller V. Clinton County, 544 F.3d 542 - bear witness Exampleenged SORTAs decision to reject the planned wrap-around advertisement, which they (SORTA) termed as aesthetically unpleasant and too controversial. Among SORTAs commercial ventures is the sale of advertising space on the buses and bus shelters it owns. However, UFCWUs proposed wrap-up advertisement, which portrayed protesting union workers fleeing from the natural law and boarding a bus belonging to SORTA was rejected. In its ruling, the district court concluded that UFCWU was favored by the balance of equities and, therefore, granted the preliminary injunctive relief (Moore 1).Case number 07-2105, Rita Miller, Plaintiff, vs. Clinton County Honorable Richard Saxton, Appellant, was argued from May 13 2008 and firm on October 1 2008. The civil rights action was brought against Richard Saxton, the Court of Comm on Pleas President Judge, by Clinton Countys former(prenominal) probation officer, Rita Miller. It was asserted by Rita Miller that Richard Saxton violated her right to free speech (First Amendment) and right to due physical process (Fourteenth Amendment) by firing her after she wrote him a complaint letter claiming hostility and intimidation from her supervisor. Miller appealed against Saxtons decision to fire her, and a district court permitted the wrongful termination case to proceed. However, the case was ignore by a federal appeals court, effectively reversing the ruling made by the district judge. Miller had aver that her supervisor had acted unprofessionally by stating the probationers were a scum and did not merit the money spent on them by the probation office. In his move to dismiss the claims, Saxton wanted to be granted a summary judgment inquiry and alleged to be immune to suit.In the UFCWU v. SORTA appeal case, the court stated that a preliminary cease and desist order aims to avert irreparable injury and uphold a courts capacity to deliver fundamental decisions based on merit in reference to Canal Authority of State of Florida v. Callaway, 489 F.2d